In plain words
In discussions of AI fairness, bias means systematic patterns that disadvantage people or misrepresent the world. The same word also has technical meanings, including an additive parameter in a model and assumptions built into a learning method.
A closer look
Bias can enter through who is represented in the data, how labels are assigned, which objective is optimized, or where a model is deployed. A dataset can be large and still omit important situations. A model can achieve high average accuracy while performing much worse for a smaller group.
Examining bias involves choosing relevant populations, comparing error patterns, and understanding the consequences of those errors. There is no single fairness score that resolves every case: different definitions can conflict, and the appropriate tradeoffs depend on the task and its social context.
In practice
A speech recognizer trained mostly on one accent may repeatedly mistranscribe another. Its overall accuracy can hide the problem unless performance is evaluated across different speakers.
A useful distinction
Removing sensitive attributes does not necessarily remove unfairness. Other features may act as proxies, and the labels or task design may already encode unequal treatment. Conversely, a neural-network “bias term” is not itself a claim about social prejudice.